| Richard Cooke is an
international photographer who lives in the village of Cogenhoe, just outside Northampton.
Originally from Derbyshire, Richard has lived here for many years and loves the area. Richard was commissioned by the Royal Mail to take an aerial shot for their
special Millennium Collection issue of postage stamps. He is one of only half a dozen
photographers to have their names printed on the face of a postage stamp, and joins other
distinguished photographers such as Tessa Traegar, Lord Snowdon, and Don Mcullen in this
notable event.
He has kindly allowed us to reproduce some of his
amazing aerial photographs together with a recent interview with Paul Mellor.

Shot for the centre piece
of an Airbus calendar |
|
"A feature on aerial
photography? You really must talk to Richard Cooke hes taken some stunning
pictures." Now, I hate to admit it, but at that time I was not familiar with Richard
or his work, but a recommendation like that from a fellow photographer was enough to find
me on a train going north to Wellingborough. Richard was to meet me at the station and
take me back to his country pile for a chat and tea on the lawn.
As we sped through the country lanes, that little voice
inside was telling me that this was no ordinary photographer and that, like his driving,
his pictures were going to show a considerable amount of attitude. The weather
was throwing a tantrum outside and so it was while supping tea at the kitchen table that I
asked him how he had entered the wonderful world of photography. |
"I had no particular ambitions of ever becoming a
photographer and, following a job at Cogent Elliot working in art buying and traffic,
David Puttnam asked me to work with him as a photographers agent. I did that for a
couple of years representing people like Richard Avedon and David Montgomery
and eventually I moved down to London and represented Ed Pritchard and a couple of other
photographers. But in the end I really didnt like it it just wasnt
satisfying enough.
"One day I looked in the mirror and said, Richard, why
are you doing something you dont like, for money you dont need?. I
wasnt married then, I had been successful and had enough money not to have to work
for a few years, so I stopped that and became a full time inventor. I had always invented
things Ive got drawers full but never had the time to actually develop the
ideas. I had some success at that but not a lot, but then I was perfectly happy waiting
for the big break to come along".
And the big break did come, but quite in the form that Richard
expected. The picture editor of a magazine a girl friend asked him if he
could recommend a photographer for a job, as all her usual contacts were
unavailable.Unable at that time to think of anyone suitable he suggested, "Lend me
your camera and Ill go and do it", which he did. And as a result "Two
amazing things happened. One, I discovered I liked it, despite never having taken pictures
as an amateur or even for fun, and at college I hadnt done anything but painting,
and the second amazing thing was that THEY liked it."
Inevitably the magazine asked him to shoot another job, and then
another and another, but he still didnt consider himself to be a photographer until,
"I was on a plane going to new York with four jobs to do and I thought
oh, I guess Im a photographer!"
Richard admits that a lot of his successes at that point had been
achieved without a lot of determination or effort, which to me indicates a person who has
the ability to be good at almost anything they turn their hand to. One thing led to
another, and through his editorial contacts he started to get military assignments, one of
which was on the aircraft carrier Ark Royal. This appears to be the turning point in his
career as he recounts, "I have always had a tendency to get really close to things, a
bit like the Eagle Comic front cover where everything goes whoosh, real in-your-face
stuff. Anyway, they gave me the wrong type of ear defenders and I was on deck when the
blast from a Phantom taking off lifted the ear defenders from my head just the one
time when you really need them." With typical understatement he recalls "I was
fairly impressed by that". So much so that he mentioned to his MOD escort that he
would quite like a ride in one. Two weeks later the chap phoned Richard to say he
couldnt get him a trip in a Phantom but could Richard sell a piece on a Jaguar
Squadron. "Too right" came the reply, and the result was he went fast jet flying
for the first time in a Jaguar. He also discovered he was one of those lucky people who
have a cast iron stomach and never gets ill whilst flying "no matter how much G they
are pulling or whatever manoeuvre they get up to".
A close up picture through the canopy of another Jaguar was printed
as a double page spread in the magazine and so impressed the picture editor of another
publication The Sunday Times Magazine that he wrote to Richard saying
"what a nice picture
send me your book." This led to commissions for that
magazine, followed by The Telegraph, Times, Mail on Sunday etc. etc.
I was impressed, this boy had cracked it and without trying
too hard. Richards ability to get on with people paid dividends and, whilst on a
decompression course which he had to undertake before his Jaguar flight, he met a senior
engineer with the Red Arrows who was impressed by the enthusiasm that oozed from this
remarkable photographer. The engineers offer of "help should he ever need
it" was called in when the Telegraph Magazine asked Richard to do a piece on the Red
Arrows.
"I came up with what was really quite a good idea" he
modestly explains. "Having flown with them for a few times, the idea was to fit a
camera to the outside of my aeroplane looking backwards and then to stay in very close
formation, which is precisely what the Red Arrows can do."
The result of this was the first wide angle, close-formation,
head on picture of jets in flight and he admits that the shot "caused such a
stir that I was then commissioned to do a lot of advertising work for the Royal Air
Force".
Pioneering the technique of outboard camera mounting brought a
number of technical difficulties to solve and this is where Richards days as an
inventor paid off. Vibration, temperature control and making housings were right up his
street, and with the help of the engineers, the motor drive Nikon was
hot-wired into the bomb release circuit so that when the button
was pressed, instead of an unpleasant payload being delivered, a frame was exposed.
He continues, "The only thing that is impossible to overcome
with an outside camera is that you cant change film mid-flight. You have just ONE
roll of film and ALL the decisions have to be made before take-off". Planning and
accuracy are absolutely paramount as Richard qualifies: " I did a costing on one shot
for the RAF and found that we used £45,000 worth of fuel that was just the gas
bill and for that I got one roll of film!".
| The shot of the Harrier firing its
rockets brought further problems. The whole firing procedure is over in 0.2 seconds, and
haphazard shooting with a motor drive at five frames per second, could result in you
missing the whole episode. With the burst of rockets costing around £14,000 there would
be "such a lot of egg on your face" that a more reliable method had to be found. The solution came by carefully liaising with the Harrier pilot who was to be
flying just 20 feet behind the camera mounted Gnat. Richard takes up the plot, "What
I discovered was that when the pilot was giving me 3-2-1-go, I could hit the button
reliably and precisely at the same moment. I hit the button knowing that wasnt the
shot, it was the next one, and on the third frame 0.2 seconds later, they were all gone
mind you so had we, in a different direction, pulling G
..". There is in
fact a slight twist to this story. The job was for RAF Recruitment through JWT and the
original brief was to take the shots from the side as being in front of a forward-firing
weapon was illegal. But, with his inexhaustible quest for something new,
complemented by his natural charm, Richard arranged with the pilot to save a few of the
rockets for the head-on shot to be taken, once the briefed pictures were in the bag. The
Cooke shot was of course a great success and was used in all of the ads,
however Richard was subsequently summoned to the MOD and in no uncertain terms told
"well done, great shot DONT do it again." What about the Harrier
pilot? Well, he was due to leave the squadron anyway, otherwise he probably wouldnt
have been so helpful! |

| It is simply not done to be in front of a forward firing
weapon.... |
|
 |
The Smirnoff shoot is another example of
detailed organisation and precision planning. The shot was taken using a 20mm lens on a
rear mounted Nikon, and with the aircraft rattling along at nearly 5 miles a minute and on
occasions only 5 feet from the rear of the camera ship, there was no room for error. A
Mustang was used in preference to a Spitfire as these aircraft have a history of having
teeth painted onto the fuselage, and the first task was to locate a rare silver version of
this "ballsy looking" plane. Fortunately Dave Gilmore of Pink Floyd fame had one
in his collection and was able to oblige. |
Richard decided to
base the shoot at North Weald in Essex and I wondered why he made this choice considering
our unreliable weather pattern. "When you have a problem like this, the logistics are
the major part of the battle. I looked at doing it in Florida or the South of France but
silver Mustangs are extremely rare. Dave Gilmores was the only suitable one in this
country and the other one had to come from Norway. As there were none in France, it gave
us little choice. My aircraft is a mere £2,000 per hour, but these guys are running at
about £8,000 per hour each, and with the set up and positioning time there was an awful
lot of money involved, so the UK was the best option." The aircraft, a modified
Corvette (similar to a Lear jet), which Richard was going to be in, was brought up from
Toulouse and carefully kitted out for the shot. The Mustang had the decals and teeth
fitted and the pilot was briefed in detail. The Norwegian guy had just flown in from
Lapland after completing a midnight air display "just because you CAN do that sort of
thing in the land of midnight sun", justified Richard.
Fortunately the weather held out on the day, but only just! "
On the first sortie in the morning, the sky was too clear and you could still see the
ground through the clouds, which we didnt want, but as the day went on the cloud
tops were rising higher and higher. When we went for the second run we had to go to 8,000
feet which isnt an ideal height for the Corvette, it also needs to be flown at a
comfortable speed for positioning and manoeuvring the Mustangs are extremely
powerful machines and normally fly much faster so there had to be a compromise". He
says, "We only just made it, I couldnt follow the cloud tops any higher."
His relief in accomplishing the shot is obvious, a second day shooting would be no
guarantee of success as the weather pattern could have been entirely different. He
concluded, "I only just got it that day, there were two sorties two rolls of
film." I remarked that he didnt exactly sting the agencies for high film and
processing costs on his shoots. This seemed to create a degree of amusement, almost as
though the thought hadnt previously crossed his mind, however he was quick to point
out that despite the first roll being unsuitable, "there were an awful lot of good
shots to choose from in the end out of one roll there were at least a dozen that
you couldnt really decide between." A result like that says so much about the
skill and organisation of this guy that I could only nod enthusiastically in admiration.
With tea cups replenished and time rapidly passing, I am interested
to know a little more about what drives this man, and given the radical situations that he
finds himself in, how much of a risk taker he is. "I think things out, although a lot
of this stuff looks a bit macho and close, none of it is cowboy stuff, none of it is
messing about with your mates down the flying club and trying it on; its working
with the ultimate in professionals and calculating every risk, knowing where youre
going to go if something does go wrong and what youre going to do."
What about the future? Having achieved so much and raised himself to
the top of his profession, where does he go from here?
At that point, I shouldnt have been surprised at the reply,
but his answer was not quite what I was expecting. "Ive been very tightly
associated with aeroplanes which has been a mixed blessing in a way", he explained.
"Because the results are very spectacular, people categorise you for it and they
dont offer you things you would love to do, so I would like to do more motor bikes,
cars and powerboats employing the same attitude that I do to planes to other action
subjects, but those opportunities seem to be very rare. Im not an aeroplane buff, I
like aeroplanes because of the shapes they make Im not a frustrated
pilot."
He summed it all up by saying, "Planes themselves are too tight
a pigeonhole for me and it leaves me slightly frustrated: 90% of my reputation is based on
aeroplanes. I would like to move forward and try other things. I also have a reportage
style that Ive enjoyed working at in the past and it would be so nice to be just
considered for other smaller projects, as well as the mega jobs."
All too soon we are hurtling down the country lanes
en route for the station. I am excited and exhilarated. No, it wasnt the driving
this time, but the infectious enthusiasm generated by this extraordinary, talented
photographer. |